This is an invented example built to show the format. The firm, the people and every number below are made up. Nothing here is a result from a real firm.
Last reviewed October 29, 2026 · By Dr. Jeffrey Scott Stanton, DCH
This sample is fictional. "Hartwell Family Law," its three intake staff and all scores, counts and notes are invented for illustration. They are not a benchmark, a prediction or a result from any real firm. A real audit uses your recordings or transcripts.
| Stage | Dana | Marcus | Priya |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapport | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Questions | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| Value and fee | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| Ask for the next step | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| Responding to concerns | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.6 |
Reading the table: all three score well on rapport. The lowest scores sit in "Value and fee" and "Ask for the next step."
| Person | Pattern seen | Moment it shows up |
|---|---|---|
| Dana | Price Softener | Adds "it is only" or "we can sometimes work with you" right after stating the fee. |
| Marcus | Closest to the standard | Asks for a time on most calls, loses some at "I need to think about it." |
| Priya | Texter | Moves to text after the first questions and rarely gets to a call. |
See the Price Softener and the Texter.
"The consultation is [the firm's fee]. It covers an hour with the attorney. Would Thursday at ten or Friday at two work better?"
Example of the fee and the ask in one breath. The firm states its own fee and terms.
Coach one person on one moment this week, using their own recording. Rescore the same item on new calls.
Scores by person and by stage, the pattern read, one moment to fix first with a call example, and a short plan. See what the audit includes or start with the call audit.
Scope, plainly: everything on this site concerns the conversation that turns an inquiry into an engagement. Nothing here is legal advice, nothing touches the legal work or the attorney's judgment, and any wording a firm adopts is reviewed by the firm against its jurisdiction's rules on attorney advertising, solicitation and fee communication before it is used.
Dr. Jeffrey Scott Stanton, DCH is a behavioral strategist and the founder and Chief Learning Officer of R2R Diagnostic Group. He is the former EVP of Learning & Development at Douglas Elliman Real Estate, where he trained sales professionals on the conversations that turn an inquiry into a commitment. He applies the same method, the R2R Assessment and a 14-item call-review scorecard, to law firm intake teams. The work is the conversation only; legal questions and judgment stay with the attorney.
The method, the scripts and the scorecard are on how it works, the script template and the scorecard guide.
Send a handful of recordings or transcripts. You get a scored review by person, and the one moment to fix first.